Difference between revisions of "Project"
From Valuescience
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# Proposal, draft(s), and final project delivered on or before due dates | # Proposal, draft(s), and final project delivered on or before due dates | ||
# Embodies key elements of valuescience argument (list) | # Embodies key elements of valuescience argument (list) | ||
| − | + | define science, value, valuescience | |
| − | + | value important because we base action upon, and justify action with it | |
| − | + | reliable means to discern value essential to live, die well | |
# Identifies and applies to specific issues | # Identifies and applies to specific issues | ||
| − | + | example(s) drawn from project creators' lives | |
# Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience | # Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience | ||
| − | + | changes in ideas | |
| − | + | changes in action | |
# Tailored to audience (characterize: size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.) | # Tailored to audience (characterize: size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.) | ||
# Elicits evidence of learning by audience | # Elicits evidence of learning by audience | ||
| − | + | understanding (evidence) | |
| − | + | action (evidence) | |
# Can be used again by authors or others (state how) | # Can be used again by authors or others (state how) | ||
'''Grading''' | '''Grading''' | ||
# Evidence of effort | # Evidence of effort | ||
# Quality of output as vehicle for communication | # Quality of output as vehicle for communication | ||
| − | + | engages audience | |
| − | + | understandable | |
| − | + | persuasive case for valuescience practice | |
# Amount of impact | # Amount of impact | ||
| − | + | quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow) | |
| − | + | quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential) | |
Revision as of 14:36, 31 October 2016
Purposes
- Demonstrate competence to communicate benefits of valuescience
- Disseminate valuescience
Critieria
- Proposal, draft(s), and final project delivered on or before due dates
- Embodies key elements of valuescience argument (list)
define science, value, valuescience value important because we base action upon, and justify action with it reliable means to discern value essential to live, die well
- Identifies and applies to specific issues
example(s) drawn from project creators' lives
- Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience
changes in ideas changes in action
- Tailored to audience (characterize: size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.)
- Elicits evidence of learning by audience
understanding (evidence) action (evidence)
- Can be used again by authors or others (state how)
Grading
- Evidence of effort
- Quality of output as vehicle for communication
engages audience understandable persuasive case for valuescience practice
- Amount of impact
quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow) quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential)
