Difference between revisions of "Project"

From Valuescience
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
# Disseminate valuescience
 
# Disseminate valuescience
 
'''Critieria'''
 
'''Critieria'''
# Proposal, draft(s), and final project delivered on or before due dates
+
# Deliver proposal, draft(s), and final project on or before due dates
# Embodies key elements of valuescience argument: define science, value, valuescience; value important because we base action upon, and justify action with it; reliable means to discern value essential to live, die well; valuescience sound means to address full spectrum of human concerns in integrated, sound way
+
# Embody key elements of valuescience argument: define science, value, valuescience; why value important; why sound means to discern value important; why valuescience is such
# Identifies and applies to specific issues: example(s) drawn from project creators' lives
+
# Apply valuescience to specific issue(s) using example(s) drawn from project author's(s') lives
# Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience: changes in ideas; changes in action
+
# Describe how project author(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience: changes in ideas; changes in action
# Tailored to audience: size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc. (as appropriate)
+
# Tailor to audience: describe key characteristics (e.g., size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.) as appropriate
# Elicits evidence of learning by audience: understanding (evidence); action (evidence)
+
# Elicit evidence of learning by audience: understanding (evidence); action (evidence)
# Can be used again by authors or others (state how)
+
# Reusable by authors or others (state how)
 
'''Grading'''
 
'''Grading'''
 
# Evidence of effort
 
# Evidence of effort
 
# Quality of output as vehicle for communication: engages audience; clear, understandable to target audience; persuasive case for valuescience practice
 
# Quality of output as vehicle for communication: engages audience; clear, understandable to target audience; persuasive case for valuescience practice
 
# Amount of impact: quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow); quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential)
 
# Amount of impact: quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow); quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential)

Revision as of 14:53, 31 October 2016

Purposes

  1. Demonstrate competence to communicate benefits of valuescience
  2. Disseminate valuescience

Critieria

  1. Deliver proposal, draft(s), and final project on or before due dates
  2. Embody key elements of valuescience argument: define science, value, valuescience; why value important; why sound means to discern value important; why valuescience is such
  3. Apply valuescience to specific issue(s) using example(s) drawn from project author's(s') lives
  4. Describe how project author(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience: changes in ideas; changes in action
  5. Tailor to audience: describe key characteristics (e.g., size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.) as appropriate
  6. Elicit evidence of learning by audience: understanding (evidence); action (evidence)
  7. Reusable by authors or others (state how)

Grading

  1. Evidence of effort
  2. Quality of output as vehicle for communication: engages audience; clear, understandable to target audience; persuasive case for valuescience practice
  3. Amount of impact: quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow); quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential)