Difference between revisions of "Project"
From Valuescience
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# Disseminate valuescience | # Disseminate valuescience | ||
'''Critieria''' | '''Critieria''' | ||
| − | # | + | # Proposal, draft(s), and final project delivered on or before due dates |
# Embodies key elements of valuescience argument (list) | # Embodies key elements of valuescience argument (list) | ||
| − | # Identifies and applies to specific issues ( | + | - define science, value, valuescience |
| − | # Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience | + | - value important because we base action upon, and justify action with it |
| − | # Tailored to audience (characterize) | + | - reliable means to discern value essential to live, die well |
| + | # Identifies and applies to specific issues | ||
| + | - example(s) drawn from project creators' lives | ||
| + | # Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience | ||
| + | - changes in ideas | ||
| + | - changes in action | ||
| + | # Tailored to audience (characterize: size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.) | ||
# Elicits evidence of learning by audience | # Elicits evidence of learning by audience | ||
| − | + | - understanding (evidence) | |
| − | + | - action (evidence) | |
# Can be used again by authors or others (state how) | # Can be used again by authors or others (state how) | ||
'''Grading''' | '''Grading''' | ||
# Evidence of effort | # Evidence of effort | ||
| − | # Quality of output as vehicle for communication | + | # Quality of output as vehicle for communication |
| − | # Amount of impact | + | - engages audience |
| + | - understandable | ||
| + | - persuasive case for valuescience practice | ||
| + | # Amount of impact | ||
| + | - quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow) | ||
| + | - quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential) | ||
Revision as of 14:33, 31 October 2016
Purposes
- Demonstrate competence to communicate benefits of valuescience
- Disseminate valuescience
Critieria
- Proposal, draft(s), and final project delivered on or before due dates
- Embodies key elements of valuescience argument (list)
- define science, value, valuescience - value important because we base action upon, and justify action with it - reliable means to discern value essential to live, die well
- Identifies and applies to specific issues
- example(s) drawn from project creators' lives
- Describes how project initiator(s) benefitted by practicing valuescience
- changes in ideas - changes in action
- Tailored to audience (characterize: size, age, relation to project creators, education, socioeconomic status, etc.)
- Elicits evidence of learning by audience
- understanding (evidence) - action (evidence)
- Can be used again by authors or others (state how)
Grading
- Evidence of effort
- Quality of output as vehicle for communication
- engages audience - understandable - persuasive case for valuescience practice
- Amount of impact
- quality of change (i.e., big or small, deep or shallow, broad or narrow) - quantity of change (number of people, to date, potential)
